Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax paid on terminal handling charges, documentation charges and bill of lading charges used in connection with export of goods was refundable under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T., notwithstanding the manner in which the service provider had classified or discharged tax.
Analysis: Serial No. 2 of the table annexed to Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. covered services provided for export of goods, and the benefit was not made contingent upon the service provider's registration category. The Board's Circular No. 112/6/2009-S.T. clarified that refund could not be denied merely because the taxable service was not reflected under the supplier's registration, so long as the service received was one notified for export purposes. Consistent Tribunal decisions had also recognised refund eligibility for services received in relation to export of goods. The subsequent amendment by Notification No. 17/2009-S.T. did not assist the Revenue on the facts found.
Conclusion: The refund was held admissible and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a service is notified as a service provided for export of goods, refund of service tax cannot be denied merely because the service provider's registration or tax classification differs, if the service was otherwise used for export.