Limitation for appeal by registered post depends on proved receipt, and condonable delay must be considered before rejection.

Under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the limitation period for appeal runs from communication of the order, with a further condonable period on sufficient cause. A presumption of service may arise from dispatch by registered post, but the date of actual receipt cannot be mechanically fixed without evidence, and if receipt is disputed, supporting material such as acknowledgment should be produced. On the facts discussed, even the assumed earlier receipt date still left the appeal within the condonable delay period, so rejection as time-barred was set aside and the matter remanded for consideration of condonation and, if allowed, disposal on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Commissioner (Appeals) was justified in treating the appeal as time-barred on a presumed date of receipt of the adjudication order, and whether the delay, if any, was within the period capable of condonation.

Analysis: The limitation for filing an appeal under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 during the relevant period was three months from the date of communication of the order, with a further condonable period available on sufficient cause. The presumption that an order sent by registered post A.D. must have been received within one week of dispatch was held to be unsustainable. While receipt of a posted order may be presumed in appropriate circumstances under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the date of receipt cannot be mechanically presumed without proof, and if the department disputes the assessee's asserted date of receipt, supporting evidence such as acknowledgment must be produced. Even on the assumed earlier date of receipt, the appeal would have been within the condonable delay period.

Conclusion: The dismissal of the appeal as time-barred was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider condonation of delay and, if condoned, to decide the appeal on merits.

Ratio Decidendi: A presumption of service from dispatch by registered post may arise, but the date of actual receipt cannot be presumed without evidence, and an appeal cannot be rejected as time-barred when the delay falls within the statutory condonable period.

---