Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (9) TMI 702 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Debenture interest not chargeable under Interest Tax Act, court affirms. Notional interest excluded. The High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that interest on debentures does not constitute chargeable interest under the Interest Tax Act. It was ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Debenture interest not chargeable under Interest Tax Act, court affirms. Notional interest excluded.

                          The High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that interest on debentures does not constitute chargeable interest under the Interest Tax Act. It was held that notional interest should not be included in calculating chargeable interest. The court also ruled that the judgment in the Lakshmi Vilas Bank case remains relevant even after the amendment of the Interest Tax Act. The decisions were in favor of the assessee, and the appeals were dismissed with no costs.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether interest on debentures forms part of chargeable interest under the Interest Tax Act.
                          2. Whether notional interest should be included for calculating chargeable interest under the Interest Tax Act.
                          3. Applicability of the judgment in Lakshmi Vilas Bank case post-amendment of the Interest Tax Act after the assessment year 1991-92.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Interest on Debentures and Chargeable Interest under the Interest Tax Act
                          The primary issue was whether interest earned on debentures should be considered as chargeable interest under the Interest Tax Act. The assessee claimed exemption, arguing that the nature of the investment in debentures was not chargeable under the Act. The Assessing Officer included the interest on debentures in the chargeable interest. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) both relied on the Madras High Court decision in CIT v. Lakshmi Vilas Bank, which held that debentures are different from loans and advances and thus not chargeable under the Interest Tax Act. This position was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax V. Sahara India Savings and Investment Corporation Ltd., which clarified that "interest on investments" is not taxable as interest under section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act.

                          Issue 2: Addition of Notional Interest
                          The second issue was whether notional interest should be included in the chargeable interest. The assessee contended that notional interest, which was never received or receivable, falls outside the purview of chargeable interest under the Interest Tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld this view, stating that notional interest cannot be considered as part of chargeable interest, drawing an analogy with interest on bad and doubtful debts which are not included unless credited to the profit and loss account. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue, but the High Court confirmed that notional interest is not included in the definition of "interest" under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, and thus should not be added for tax purposes.

                          Issue 3: Applicability of Lakshmi Vilas Bank Judgment Post-Amendment
                          The third issue was whether the judgment in Lakshmi Vilas Bank, which dealt with pre-amended provisions of the Interest Tax Act applicable up to the assessment year 1991-92, was still relevant. The Revenue argued that post-1991 amendments, interest on debentures should be included. However, the Supreme Court's decision in the Sahara case clarified that even after the amendments, the definition of "interest" under section 2(7) did not extend to interest on debentures. The High Court concluded that the Lakshmi Vilas Bank judgment remains valid and applicable.

                          Conclusion:
                          The High Court dismissed the appeals, confirming the orders of the Tribunal and answering all substantial questions of law against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee. The court held that:
                          1. Interest on debentures does not form part of chargeable interest under the Interest Tax Act.
                          2. Notional interest cannot be included for calculating chargeable interest.
                          3. The Lakshmi Vilas Bank judgment remains applicable post-amendment of the Interest Tax Act.

                          The appeals were dismissed with no costs, and the Tax C.M.P No.1 of 2014 was closed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found