TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court orders remand to Tribunal to determine if Zinc Oxide qualifies as mineral for tax deduction</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income Tax-Delhi Versus Subhash Chand Rastogi</h3> Commissioner of Income Tax-Delhi Versus Subhash Chand Rastogi - TMI Issues:1. Interpretation of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding deduction eligibility for export of Zinc Oxide.2. Whether Zinc Oxide qualifies as a mineral under Section 80HHC.Interpretation of Section 80HHC:The case involved an appeal by the Revenue concerning the deduction claimed under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 1991-92. The respondent-assessee, an individual, declared a taxable income of Rs. 20,000 after claiming a deduction of Rs. 45,51,898 under Section 80HHC on account of the export of Zinc Oxide. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction citing that the export to Nepal was ineligible under Section 80HHC and that Zinc Oxide, being a mineral, did not qualify. However, the CIT(A) reversed this finding, stating that Zinc Oxide was an inorganic chemical and the export was made to a convertible foreign exchange area. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the export was to Hong Kong through Nepal, not to Nepal directly, making it eligible for the deduction under Section 80HHC.Classification of Zinc Oxide as a Mineral:The Revenue contended that Zinc Oxide should be considered a mineral under Section 80HHC, making the export proceeds ineligible for deduction. The Tribunal's order did not address this argument, leading to the conclusion that the issue of whether Zinc Oxide was a mineral or a processed mineral, as specified in the 12th Schedule, remained unresolved. The Tribunal's silence on this crucial aspect prompted the High Court to remand the case back to the Tribunal for a determination on whether the exported goods constituted a mineral, as per the provisions of Section 80HHC(2)(b)(ii). The Court highlighted the necessity for the Tribunal to ascertain whether the product was a mineral in its pure form or a processed mineral, considering the relevant legal precedents and definitions of 'mineral' provided by the Supreme Court and the Karnataka High Court.In conclusion, the High Court ruled in favor of the appellant-Revenue, ordering a remand to the Tribunal for a detailed examination of whether Zinc Oxide qualified as a mineral under Section 80HHC. The Court emphasized the importance of determining the nature of the exported goods to ascertain their eligibility for deduction under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
TaxTMI 