Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order passed under Section 39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was liable to be set aside for denial of personal hearing and breach of natural justice.
Analysis: The petitioner had specifically sought an opportunity of personal hearing before the reassessment was completed. The impugned order recorded that a hearing had been granted, but it did not indicate the date on which the petitioner or its authorised representative was actually heard. In the absence of material showing that a real personal hearing had taken place, the recording of such hearing could not be accepted. Since the petitioner required an opportunity to explain numerous transaction details, fairness demanded that a personal hearing be afforded before the reassessment was finalised.
Conclusion: The reassessment order was set aside for violation of natural justice and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.