Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the consideration of Rs. 2.80 crores received on surrender of 1400 sq. ft. area was assessable as undisclosed income in the block assessment; (ii) Whether the additions of Rs. 2.90 crores and consequential interest were taxable in the assessee's hands during the block period.
Issue (i): Whether the consideration of Rs. 2.80 crores received on surrender of 1400 sq. ft. area was assessable as undisclosed income in the block assessment.
Analysis: Disclosure for the purpose of block assessment requires a return of income filed before the date of search including the disputed amount. Oral or written statements before the tax authorities do not amount to such disclosure. The material relating to surrender of rights in the property was available and, since the amount was not offered to tax by filing a return before search, the agreement constituted incriminating material for block assessment. The assessee had also disclosed the amount only in the block return, while the regular return for the relevant year was filed after search without declaring the capital gain.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 2.80 crores was sustained and this issue was decided against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the additions of Rs. 2.90 crores and consequential interest were taxable in the assessee's hands during the block period.
Analysis: The amount of Rs. 2.90 crores was never received by the assessee. The assessee followed the cash system of accounting, and the settlement agreement recorded that the amount was not paid and stood adjusted in the later settlement. On that basis, the amount could not be taxed on accrual during the block period, and no addition could be made for interest said to arise on the same amount. The unrelated addition of Rs. 4,32,000 on account of interest on IDBI bonds was not pressed and was confirmed.
Conclusion: The additions of Rs. 2.90 crores and Rs. 43,04,710 were deleted, while the addition of Rs. 4,32,000 was sustained.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded only in part, as the block addition of Rs. 2.80 crores was maintained, but the additions linked to Rs. 2.90 crores and related interest were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: For block assessment, only income that is undisclosed and supported by pre-search non-disclosure in the return can be brought to tax, and where the assessee follows the cash system, income not actually received cannot be taxed on accrual.