Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revenue appeal was maintainable in view of the monetary limits prescribed by the departmental circulars.
Analysis: The dispute involved a refund claim of a very small amount, and the applicable circulars of the Central Board of Excise and Customs fixed monetary limits below which appeals should not be filed before the High Court. The Court noted that the circular in force at the time of admission governed the filing of the appeal and that the amount involved was well below the prescribed threshold. In these circumstances, the Court found it unnecessary to enter into the substantial questions of law raised in the appeal.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable in view of the monetary limit and was therefore dismissed.
Final Conclusion: The dismissal rested on the revenue policy governing low-value tax litigation, leaving the questions of law open for decision in an appropriate case.