Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of property in the goods and the resulting sale were in the course of export so as to fall outside the taxing power under Article 286 of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975.
Analysis: Article 286 prohibits State taxation on sales or purchases taking place in the course of export. Section 8 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 gave effect to that constitutional restriction, while Section 5(1) and Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 supplied the tests for determining when a sale is deemed to be in the course of export. The governing principle is that an export sale must form part of a single integrated transaction with the export, or must occasion the export, and the real nature of the transaction must be gathered from the surrounding circumstances rather than from any single formal feature such as description in the goods receipt. The Tribunal erred in treating the absence of the assessee's name as consignee as decisive. The precedents relied upon show that the decisive inquiry is whether the transaction was integrated with the export and whether the goods were actually exported.
Conclusion: The sale was held to be in the course of export and therefore not liable to local sales tax; the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.