Appeal partly allowed, TPO to rework transfer pricing, margin computation, and Section 10A deduction

The appeal in the case was partly allowed. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was directed to rework the transfer pricing adjustment after excluding certain comparables and considering objections raised by the assessee. The TPO was also instructed to reconsider the margin computation of the assessee, specifically regarding the exclusion of rent for unutilized floor space. Additionally, the deduction under Section 10A was to be computed by excluding communication charges from total turnover, following relevant court precedents.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment
2. Margin Computation of the Assessee
3. Section 10A Deduction

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
The primary issue is the selection of comparables by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and the computation of the margin of the assessee. The TPO rejected the assessee's Transfer Pricing (TP) study for several reasons, including the use of multiple-year data and the selection of companies with related party transactions exceeding 25% of operating revenue. The TPO conducted a fresh search and selected 27 comparables, resulting in a TP adjustment of Rs. 1,68,93,619.

Selection of Comparables:
- Accurate Data Converter and Nittany Outsourcing: These companies were included without prior notice and without discussion. The TPO is directed to reconsider their inclusion after providing the assessee an opportunity to raise objections.
- Accentia Technologies Limited: The company is functionally different due to high overseas business expenses and substantial marketing expenses. Additionally, multiple acquisitions during the year impacted profitability. The TPO is directed to exclude this company.
- Asit C Mehta Financial Services Ltd.: This company operates in a different vertical with a different cost structure. The TPO is directed to exclude it based on the coordinate bench decisions.
- Vishal Information Technologies: Functionally different due to low employee cost and high vendor payments for data entry, indicating outsourcing. The TPO is directed to exclude this company.
- Eclerx Services Limited: Engaged in knowledge process outsourcing (KPO) with extraordinarily high profit margins. The TPO is directed to exclude this company.
- Mold-Tek Technologies Limited: Exhibited supernormal profit and is functionally different, providing structural engineering consulting services. The TPO is directed to exclude this company.
- HCL Comnet Systems & Services Limited, Infosys BPO Limited, and Wipro Limited: These companies have significantly higher turnovers compared to the assessee. The TPO is directed to exclude these companies based on the turnover filter.
- Genesys Corporation: Functionally different, requiring highly skilled manpower and performing R&D services. The TPO is directed to exclude this company.

The TPO/AO is directed to rework the TP adjustment after excluding the aforementioned comparables and considering the objections raised by the assessee.

2. Margin Computation of the Assessee:
The assessee's operating margin was calculated at 12.42% by the TPO, whereas the assessee calculated it at 15.18%. The discrepancy arose due to the exclusion of rent for unutilized floor space. The TPO/AO is directed to reconsider this issue, allowing the assessee to present objections and verifying the adjustments for unutilized floor space.

3. Section 10A Deduction:
The assessee challenged the reduction of communication charges from export turnover without reducing it from total turnover while computing the deduction under Section 10A. This issue is covered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery Ltd. and the ITAT Chennai Special Bench in ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd. The AO is directed to exclude the communication charges from total turnover as well. This ground is allowed in favor of the assessee.

Conclusion:
The appeal is partly allowed. The TPO/AO is directed to rework the TP adjustment and consider the cost issue as directed. The deduction under Section 10A should be computed by excluding communication charges from total turnover.

---