Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transaction value declared by the importers for the goods imported in November 2008 was acceptable for customs valuation purposes.
Analysis: The goods had originally been shipped to earlier importers at a higher declared price, but that transaction did not culminate in a completed sale and no delivery to those importers took place. The later contract with the appellants was entered into on 06.11.2008 at the then prevailing international market price, and the declared invoice value was supported by that contract. The rejection of the declared value could not rest merely on the earlier abandoned import or on contemporaneous import figures unrelated to the appellants' own import transaction. Under section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, the relevant value is the price actually paid or payable for the goods sold for export to India for delivery at the time and place of importation, and the cost additions contemplated by Rule 10(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 required inclusion of demurrage charges paid on behalf of the supplier up to the date of contract.
Conclusion: The declared transaction value was not liable to be rejected, and the assessable value was to be taken as the invoice price plus demurrage charges up to 06.11.2008, in favour of the appellants.