TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court upholds TDS payment deletion, dismisses tax appeal citing retrospective amendment effect. Further consideration on P.F. and ESIC contribution disallowance.</h1> The Court upheld the deletion of disallowance of TDS payment under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2009-10, citing the ... TDS payment made after due date – Effect of amendment to section 40(a)(ia) – Held that:- Following the decision in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II Versus GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION [2014 (2) TMI 120 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] - amendment u/s 40(1)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 brought out by the Finance Act, 2010 w.e.f. 01.04.2010 is having retrospective effect – Decided against Revenue. Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of TDS payment under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Disallowance of employees' contribution towards P.F. and ESIC under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:Issue 1: Disallowance of TDS payment under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The Revenue challenged the deletion of disallowance of TDS payment under Section 40(a)(ia) for Assessment Year 2009-10. The main contention was whether TDS payment made before the due date of filing the return of income should be allowable as an expenditure. The Tribunal upheld the deletion, citing the retrospective effect of the amendment to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 from 01.04.2010. The Revenue argued that the retrospective application could not extend prior to 01.04.2010 due to a previous amendment by the Finance Act, 2008. However, the Court referred to a Division Bench decision holding that the 2010 amendment has retrospective effect. Consequently, the Court held against the Revenue and dismissed the tax appeal regarding this issue.Issue 2: Disallowance of employees' contribution towards P.F. and ESIC under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The Revenue also contested the deletion of disallowance related to employees' contribution towards P.F. and ESIC under Section 36(1)(va). The Tribunal relied on a Supreme Court decision in the case of Alom Extrusions Ltd. to support the deletion. The Revenue argued that the Supreme Court's decision did not cover employees' contribution under Section 36(1)(va). The Court noted the specific controversy in the Alom Extrusions Ltd. case and emphasized that the deduction under Section 36(1)(va) was distinct. The Court directed further consideration of this issue based on the Division Bench decision in Tax Appeal No. 637/2013 and other related matters, scheduling a final disposal hearing.In conclusion, the judgment addressed the issues of disallowance of TDS payment and employees' contribution towards P.F. and ESIC under specific sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court's analysis focused on the retrospective application of relevant amendments and the interpretation of legal provisions in light of previous judicial decisions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
