Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit could be availed on the basis of a photocopy of an extra copy of the invoice instead of the prescribed invoice copy.
Analysis: The credit scheme required the assessee to base its claim on the prescribed invoice copy, and where the duplicate copy was lost, credit could be claimed only in the manner recognised by the rules. A photocopy of an extra copy of the invoice did not satisfy the statutory requirement, and acceptance of such a document would dilute the discipline of the credit scheme. The Evidence Act provisions relating to certified copies did not make a photocopy of an invoice a permissible document for availing duty credit under the excise rules. The Tribunal also relied on prior precedent and the departmental circular stating that photocopies were not to be accepted.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on a photocopy of the extra copy of the invoice was not admissible and the assessee's claim failed.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge succeeded, the allowance of credit by the appellate authority was set aside, and the adjudicating authority's denial of credit was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit under the excise scheme must be claimed only on the document prescribed by the rules, and a photocopy of an invoice copy is not a valid substitute for availing Modvat or Cenvat credit.