Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a prosecution under section 276C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can be initiated before completion of regular assessment proceedings, and whether pendency of assessment or appellate proceedings bars such prosecution.
Analysis: The proceedings arose out of a search and a summary order under section 132(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, followed by complaints under section 276C. The challenge was that, in the absence of regular assessment orders, the complaints were premature and the tax liability had not been finally determined. The Court relied on the principle that pendency of assessment or reassessment proceedings does not by itself prevent initiation of criminal prosecution under sections 276C and 277, and that the criminal court must determine the offence independently on the evidence before it. It was also noted that later assessment orders, or appellate orders affecting them, may be taken into account by the criminal court, and in an appropriate case the trial court may exercise discretion to adjourn or postpone the matter, but there is no rigid rule requiring prior final assessment before prosecution can begin.
Conclusion: Initiation of prosecution under section 276C is not barred merely because regular assessment proceedings are pending or have not been completed; the challenge to the complaints fails.