Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit where the job worker had paid duty on the processed goods and the credit was claimed on the duty so paid.
Analysis: The goods were sent to the job worker under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The job worker paid duty on the processed goods, and the principal manufacturer availed credit of that duty. The situation was held to be revenue neutral, and it was noted that credit of duty paid, though not payable, is admissible. An earlier Tribunal order dealing with an identical arrangement had already taken the same view in favour of the assessee.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and both stay applications were allowed in favour of the assessee.