Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after service of notice under section 139(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, penalty could still be imposed for default under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The issue was a pure question of law and was covered by the Full Bench decision of the same court, which held that penalty was leviable for the default in filing the return notwithstanding the service of notice under section 139(2). Applying that binding view, the Tribunal's contrary conclusion was held to be incorrect.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative, and the answer was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Service of notice under section 139(2) does not bar imposition of penalty for default under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.