Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-S.T. in respect of GTA services despite the absence of contemporaneous certificates from the transporters, and whether the demand of tax and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The assessee established that the transporters were not registered with the Service Tax department, which supported the conclusion that they had not availed Cenvat credit or the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-S.T. The assessee also produced certificates subsequently obtained from the transporters before the appellate authority, and those certificates were ignored without justification. On this basis, the condition relating to non-availment of credit and exemption stood satisfied, making the abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-S.T. available.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 1/2006-S.T., and the confirmed demand of service tax and the penalty were unsustainable and were set aside.