Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 25,930 received pursuant to an arbitral award was exigible to tax in the hands of the assessee-firm or the reconstituted firm for the assessment year 1974-75.
Analysis: The amount arose from a contract entered into by the original firm, and the firm was later reconstituted with one continuing partner. On reconstitution, the firm was treated as the same assessee entity in substance, attracting the rule applicable to a continuing firm under section 187 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The amount therefore remained taxable in the hands of the reconstituted firm.
Conclusion: The amount was rightly held taxable in the hands of the assessee-firm, and the answer to the referred question was in favour of the Revenue.