Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether modvat credit on HDPE granules was inadmissible on the ground that only one grade of granules could be used in the manufacture of HDPE pipes supplied to DOT, and whether the Revenue's appeal against the order allowing credit was sustainable.
Analysis: The materials on record showed that the assessee manufactured HDPE pipes for DOT and used Relene E-41003 along with other grades of HDPE granules by blending or mixing them in manufacture. The earlier Tribunal decisions relied upon had already held that such blending of different grades could produce pipes conforming to DOT specifications, and no factual distinction was established in the present matter. The Department itself acknowledged blending of Relene E-41003 with other grades, and the Revenue failed to show any basis to depart from the settled view applied in the earlier cases.
Conclusion: The modvat credit was held admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.