TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned letter could be treated as an appealable order under Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 2(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: An appeal under Section 129A(1) lies only from a decision or order passed by the Commissioner of Customs acting as an adjudicating authority. For a communication to qualify as such an order, there must be a judicial determination by the competent authority, and the decision must be communicated to the aggrieved party. Here, the records did not show any adjudication order by the Commissioner having been passed and communicated to the appellant. The impugned letter was only a communication issued by the Assistant Commissioner after approval for e-auction, and it did not itself amount to an adjudicatory decision of the Commissioner.
Conclusion: The letter was not an appealable order, and the appeal was not maintainable.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal declined to entertain the challenge, holding that the dispute did not arise from a communicated adjudication order of the Commissioner and therefore could not be pursued before it.
Ratio Decidendi: A communication is appealable before the Tribunal only if it conveys a judicially made decision or order of the Commissioner acting as an adjudicating authority under the Customs Act, 1962.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
