Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported energy drink was classifiable under CTH 2202 10 10 as mineral water or aerated water containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or flavoured, or under CTH 2202 90 90 as other non-alcoholic beverages.
Analysis: The product contained taurine, glucuronolactone, caffeine, inositol, B vitamins, sucrose, glucose and sugar. On that composition, and in view of the material indicating that it was treated as a caffeinated beverage rather than mineral water or aerated water, the scope of CTH 2202 10 10 was found to be inapplicable. The classification was also supported by the tariff treatment reflected in the harmonised system and by the principle that where goods do not fit the more specific competing heading, the residual heading applies. The reasoning also followed the interpretative approach under Rule 3(c), under which goods equally meriting more than one heading are placed in the heading occurring last in numerical order.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under CTH 2202 90 90 and not under CTH 2202 10 10.
Final Conclusion: The revenue appeal failed and the order classifying the imported product under the residual heading was sustained.