TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds assessment order time limit breach for government contractor</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income Tax Another Versus M/s Sincere Construction, M/s. Devi Enterprises Ltd.</h3> The Commissioner of Income Tax Another Versus M/s Sincere Construction, M/s. Devi Enterprises Ltd. - TMI Issues:- Assessment order completion within the period of limitation under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act.Analysis:The case involved the assessment of an assessee engaged in government contracts for the Assessment Year 2006-07. The initial income shown was revised to a higher amount by an assessment order dated 26.12.2008 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee contended that the assessment order was time-barred, as the assessment should have been completed by 31.12.2008 under Section 153 of the Act. The appellate authorities found that the notice of demand was served on 12.1.2009, indicating that the assessment order was passed after the limitation period. The first and second appellate authorities concluded that the assessment order was indeed passed beyond the prescribed time limit.The High Court examined the evidence and upheld the findings of the appellate authorities. It was emphasized that the question of whether the assessment order was passed within the limitation period is a factual determination based on the evidence presented before the appellate bodies. The Court noted that no evidence was provided by the department to establish that the assessment order was made on 26.12.2008 and dispatched to the assessee before 31.12.2008. The acknowledgment slip on the notice of demand indicated a receipt date of 12.1.2009, supporting the conclusion that the assessment order exceeded the time limit prescribed under the law.In light of the above analysis, the High Court found no error or perversity in the decisions of the appellate authorities. Consequently, it was held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The appeals filed by the department were deemed to fail, and thus, were dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
