1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Chennai: Duty demand set aside, but no refund granted despite reliance on precedent</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT (CHENNAI) set aside the duty demand from the appellants for a specific period. The Commissioner (Appeals) did not grant a ... Service Tax β Goods Transport Operators β Refund The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT (CHENNAI) set aside the Order-in-Original demanding duty from the appellants for a specific period. The Commissioner (Appeals) relied on a previous Tribunal decision but did not grant a refund, stating that the liability to pay service tax was not extinguished. The appellants were represented by Shri S. Renganathan, and Shri B.L. Meena represented the Revenue. The Commissioner (Appeals) should have ordered a refund after setting aside the service tax demand.