Omitted fiscal provisions cannot sustain pending proceedings without a saving clause; duty, interest and penalty orders were quashed.

Where a fiscal levy provision is omitted without any saving clause preserving pending actions, proceedings under that provision cannot validly continue to adjudication after the omission takes effect. Applying that principle, the Tribunal noted that although notices had been issued earlier, the adjudication and confirming orders were completed only after the relevant rule and corresponding statutory provision had been omitted. The demand, interest and penalty could not therefore survive, and the orders were quashed in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether proceedings initiated under the omitted compound levy provisions could be continued and concluded after omission of the relevant rule and section, and whether the adjudication confirming duty, interest and penalty could survive.

Analysis: The dispute arose under the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 and the compound levy framework. The relevant rule governing the levy stood omitted on 01.03.2001 and the corresponding statutory provision stood omitted on 11.05.2001. The judgment followed the principle that where a provision is omitted and no effective saving clause preserves pending actions, proceedings that are not concluded before the omission cannot be validly continued thereafter. The Tribunal applied that principle to the facts, noting that although the notices were issued earlier, the adjudication was completed only after the omission took effect.

Conclusion: The proceedings and the orders confirming demand could not be sustained after omission of the governing provisions, and the adjudication orders as affirmed in appeal were quashed in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The duty demands and penalties founded on the omitted provisions were set aside, and the appeals succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a saving provision, proceedings under an omitted fiscal provision cannot be initiated or continued to a conclusion after the omission takes effect.

---