TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court remits ITAT decision for fresh consideration on export premium treatment under sec. 80HHC, rules in favor of assessee</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Ami Diamonds Exporters</h3> Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Ami Diamonds Exporters - TMI Issues Involved:1. Interpretation of whether 8% premium on licenses purchased for sale or import should be treated as cash assistance against export deduction under sec. 80HHC.2. Determination of applicable clause under sec. 80HHC for deduction in a case involving cutting and polishing of rough diamonds for export, with a majority of sales in trading polished diamonds exceeding 50% of total export sales.Analysis:1. The High Court considered the first issue regarding the treatment of 8% premium on licenses for sale or import against export deduction under sec. 80HHC. The Court noted that the Tribunal did not consider the Fifth proviso inserted by the Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 2005, with retrospective effect from April 1, 1992. The Court highlighted that the Tribunal relied heavily on a previous decision without acknowledging the Fifth proviso. Consequently, the Court remitted the matter back to the ITAT for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need to review the issue in light of the Fifth proviso and the 2005 amendment.2. Moving on to the second issue, the Court addressed the application of sec. 80HHC clauses in a scenario where an assessee is engaged in cutting and polishing rough diamonds for export, with a significant portion of sales in trading polished diamonds exceeding 50% of total export sales. The Court referred to a Supreme Court decision in the case of Gem Granites, where it was established that cut and polished diamonds qualify for deduction under sec. 80HHC. Citing a 1984 Circular, the Court emphasized that cut and polished diamonds are not considered minerals or ores, hence eligible for relief under sec. 80HHC. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee on this issue, disposing of the reference and instructing the ITAT to complete the necessary consideration within six months.In conclusion, the High Court's judgment addressed the intricate issues surrounding the interpretation of tax laws related to export deductions and the treatment of specific business activities under sec. 80HHC. The Court's detailed analysis and references to relevant legal provisions and precedents provided a comprehensive resolution to the matters at hand, ensuring a fair and just outcome for the parties involved.
TaxTMI 