Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under section 36 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was leviable on tax omitted from the returns and later found on reassessment, notwithstanding the contention that section 72(2) of the Act applied only where the understatement exceeded five per cent.
Analysis: Section 36 provides for interest where tax that ought to have been declared in the return has been omitted, and sub-section (2)(c) specifically covers failure to declare tax or interest that should have been declared. Section 72(2) is a penalty provision dealing with understatement or overstatement beyond five per cent of actual liability. The two provisions operate in different fields. The presence of a five per cent threshold in the penalty provision does not import that threshold into the levy of interest under section 36. The liability to interest arises independently of the penalty regime, and the omission was not cured by a revised return within the prescribed period.
Conclusion: Interest under section 36 was rightly levied, and the assessee's challenge based on section 72(2) failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Liability to statutory interest for omission of tax from a return is independent of the penalty threshold under section 72(2), and the five per cent condition for penalty does not al the levy of interest under section 36.