Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether interest was payable on the ineligible Cenvat credit that had been availed and utilised. (ii) Whether the imposition of penalty was justified and, if so, whether the amount required reduction.
Issue (i): Whether interest was payable on the ineligible Cenvat credit that had been availed and utilised.
Analysis: The credit was found to have been wrongly availed and utilised. On that basis, interest was held payable under the Central Excise law read with the Cenvat Credit Rules. The earlier Larger Bench view relied on by the appellant was noted to have been overruled.
Conclusion: Interest was payable and the demand of interest was upheld.
Issue (ii): Whether the imposition of penalty was justified and, if so, whether the amount required reduction.
Analysis: The ineligible credit had been availed on more than one occasion and was detected by audit. This justified penalty, but the quantum was considered excessive in the circumstances.
Conclusion: Penalty was justified, but its amount was reduced to Rs. 5,000/-.
Final Conclusion: The demand of interest was sustained and the penalty was retained at a reduced amount, resulting in only partial relief to the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest is payable on wrongly availed and utilised Cenvat credit, and penalty may be sustained though the quantum can be moderated on the facts.