Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee's conversion of individual property into joint family property attracted gift-tax under section 4(2) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, for the assessment year 1973-74. (ii) Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 5(1)(viii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 in respect of the portion deemed to have been gifted to his wife.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee's conversion of individual property into joint family property attracted gift-tax under section 4(2) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, for the assessment year 1973-74.
Analysis: The relevant previous year fell within the assessment year 1973-74, and the law applicable is the law in force on the first day of that assessment year. Section 4(2), though brought into force from 1 April 1972, governed the assessment because the transaction fell within the relevant previous year. No express provision or necessary implication showed an intention to exclude such transactions from the deeming fiction created by the amendment.
Conclusion: The transaction attracted gift-tax liability for the assessment year 1973-74, and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 5(1)(viii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 in respect of the portion deemed to have been gifted to his wife.
Analysis: Section 4(2) deems a gift of the portion of converted property which the other family members would take on an immediate partition. On that footing, the wife's share constituted a deemed gift in her favour, and the statutory exemption available under section 5(1)(viii) followed in respect of that share. The exemption could not be denied merely because the gift arose through the deeming provision.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to exemption of Rs. 50,000 under section 5(1)(viii), and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Gift-tax liability was upheld on the deemed transfer, but the assessee succeeded on the statutory exemption relating to the wife's share, resulting in a partly favourable outcome for the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For assessment purposes, the law in force on the first day of the assessment year applies unless a contrary intention is clearly shown, and where a statutory deeming provision creates a gift in favour of a family member, the consequential statutory exemption attached to that gift must also be given effect to.