Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether expenditure incurred on the cultivation, upkeep or maintenance of immature plants from which no agricultural income had been derived during the previous year was allowable as a deduction under section 5 of the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950.
Analysis: Section 5(j) allows deduction only of expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of deriving agricultural income, but Explanation 2 expressly denies deduction for expenditure incurred on the cultivation, upkeep or maintenance of immature plants from which no agricultural income has been derived during the previous year. The factual finding that the disallowed amounts related to immature plants was not challenged. The Tribunal had relied on the earlier principle applicable before the insertion of the Explanation, but that principle could no longer govern claims relating to immature plants after the amendment.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative. The expenditure was not allowable as a deduction and the answer was in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: After the insertion of Explanation 2 to section 5, expenditure incurred on the cultivation, upkeep or maintenance of immature plants from which no agricultural income has been derived during the previous year is not deductible.