Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had jurisdiction to impose penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether such jurisdiction depended on the date on which the Income-tax Officer referred the matter to him before or after the deletion of section 274(2).
Analysis: The controlling factor for the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner's jurisdiction is the date of reference by the Income-tax Officer. If the reference was made before 1 April 1976, jurisdiction existed to decide the reference and impose penalty. If the reference itself was made after 1 April 1976, jurisdiction was absent, even though penalty proceedings may have been initiated earlier. The Tribunal had not decided the matter on this correct basis.
Conclusion: The answer was in favour of the Revenue to the extent that jurisdiction had to be determined only on the basis of the date of reference, and the matter was sent back to the Tribunal for fresh decision on that basis.