Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of estate duty under the Estate Duty Act, 1953, the deceased's coparcenary interest had to be computed on the footing of a notional partition by treating his wife as entitled to a share equal to that of a son.
Analysis: Section 39 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 requires the value of a deceased's interest in joint family property to be ascertained by assuming a partition immediately before death. On such a notional partition, the members of the Hindu undivided family who are entitled to a share must be taken into account. In view of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the wife, though not a coparcener in the ordinary sense, is entitled to a share equal to that of a son when a partition takes place between husband and sons. The joint family property was therefore liable to be treated as divisible into three equal shares.
Conclusion: The deceased's interest was rightly computed as one-third of the joint family property, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For estate duty valuation, the share of a deceased in Hindu undivided family property must be determined on the basis of a notional partition immediately before death, and where the wife would be entitled to an equal share on such partition, the property must be divided accordingly.