Appeals kept pending as the Court warned of dismissal for want of prosecution if directions are not complied with.

The Bombay High Court did not finally decide the appeals and adjourned them for further hearing on a later date. It indicated that the appeals could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the revenue failed to comply with the Court's directions. The operative effect was to keep the matters pending while conditioning progress on compliance with the Court's requirements.

---

---

Outcome: The Appeals were not finally decided and were directed to be taken up again on a later date, with an indication that they may be dismissed for want of prosecution if the revenue did not comply with the Court's directions.

---