Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether supply of foodstuff by an educational institution to its residential students amounted to business so as to make the institution a dealer liable to tax under the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
Analysis: The charging provision applies only to a sale made by a dealer or a person carrying on the business of taxable goods. The definitions of sale, dealer and business show that tax liability arises only where the activity is undertaken in the course of business. The institution's primary and predominant activity was imparting education, which is not trade or business. Supplying food to hostel students was only incidental and integral to the educational object, and no independent intention to carry on a business of selling foodstuff was shown. The principle applied is that incidental or ancillary transactions do not amount to business when the main activity is not a business.
Conclusion: The supply of foodstuff to residential students did not amount to business, the institution was not a dealer, and the proposed assessment on that basis was without jurisdiction.
Final Conclusion: The notices demanding tax on the hostel food supply were quashed and the writ petitions were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the principal activity of an institution is non-commercial and educational, incidental supply of food to its students does not constitute business or render the institution a dealer for sales tax purposes unless an independent business intention is established.