TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Rajasthan High Court: Bottles and Shells for Soft Drinks Production Classified as 'Plant'</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Jai Drinks Private Limited</h3> Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Jai Drinks Private Limited - [1988] 173 ITR 100, 68 CTR 41, 36 TAXMANN 330 Issues involved: Interpretation of whether bottles and shells used in bottling soft drinks constitute 'Plant' for the purpose of claiming depreciation and development rebate u/s 43(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Judgment Summary:In a case concerning assessment years 1969-70 to 1971-72, the High Court of Rajasthan addressed the question of whether bottles and shells used in bottling soft drinks qualify as 'Plant' under section 43(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a soft drink manufacturer, claimed depreciation and development rebate on these items, arguing they were integral to their business operations. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's claim, emphasizing the necessity of bottles and shells for the manufacturing process. The court referred to precedents such as CIT v. Taj Mahal Hotel and Scientific Engineering House (P.) Ltd. v. CIT to establish the broad interpretation of 'plant' to include essential business apparatus. Citing decisions like CIT v. National Air Products Ltd. and CIT v. Steel Rolling Mills of Hindusthan (P.) Ltd., the court affirmed that items like gas cylinders were considered 'plant' when essential for business activities. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that bottles and shells indeed constitute 'plant' u/s 43(3), allowing for depreciation and development rebate.
TaxTMI 