Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 74/93-CE dated 20.02.1993 for PCC poles manufactured and cleared by it on the footing that it was equivalent to the State Government or its department.
Analysis: The exemption was claimed on the basis that the appellant, being a State Electricity Board, should be treated as the State Government and that the goods were manufactured in a factory belonging to the State Government for use by a Government department. The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench ruling that a State Electricity Board is not the same as the Government or its department, and that mere 100% shareholding or ownership by the State Government does not place the Board on par with the State Government. On that footing, the conditions of the notification were not satisfied.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 74/93-CE dated 20.02.1993.