Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assessing Officer was justified in substituting the stated sale consideration of shares with a fair market value or break-up value for the purpose of computing capital gains and capital loss.
Analysis: The computation of capital gains under section 48 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 proceeds on the full value of consideration received on transfer, and substitution by a notional value is permissible only where the Act specifically so provides. The provisions permitting adoption of fair market value or deemed consideration in special situations do not authorise a general replacement of the actual sale price in ordinary sale transactions. On the facts, the shares were treated as sold, and the Assessing Officer did not bring any material to show receipt of a consideration different from the stated price. In such circumstances, the stated sale consideration could not be disturbed merely by estimating break-up value.
Conclusion: The substitution of the sale consideration by the Assessing Officer was not permissible, and the deletion made by the first appellate authority was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: In a genuine sale of shares, capital gains must be computed on the actual sale consideration unless the statute expressly authorises substitution by a deemed or fair market value and the revenue establishes facts justifying such substitution.