TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Kolkata upholds cash payment disallowance under Income-tax Act but allows full business expenditure, emphasizing compliance.</h1> <h3>Mr. Jamir Mondal Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax</h3> Mr. Jamir Mondal Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act for cash payment regarding business purposes.2. Disallowance of 50% of business expenditure under the head 'Subscription & Donations'.Issue 1 - Disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act for cash payment regarding business purposes:The appeal arose from the order of CIT(A) confirming the disallowance made by AO under section 40A(3) of the Act for cash payments exceeding limits prescribed for business purposes. The assessee contended that cash payments were made as per vendor's demand. However, both AO and CIT(A) upheld the disallowance citing the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act. The ITAT Kolkata considered the nature of the assessee's business, which involved trading in land, and the payments made in cash exceeding Rs.20,000. The assessee argued for business expediency and exceptions under Rule 6DD of the Rules. The ITAT held that Rule 6DD of the Rules provides specific conditions or exceptions, and business expediency does not exempt the assessee from section 40A(3) provisions. Consequently, the ITAT confirmed the disallowance, dismissing the appeal.Issue 2 - Disallowance of 50% of business expenditure under the head 'Subscription & Donations':The second issue pertained to the disallowance of 50% of business expenditure of Rs.80,150 under 'Subscription & Donations'. The assessee argued that the payment was necessary for safeguarding business assets due to the scattered nature of land trading business. The AO and CIT(A) disallowed 50% of the expenditure without providing reasons. The ITAT Kolkata, after considering the specific nature of the business, allowed the entire expenditure, overturning the disallowance. Consequently, this issue of the assessee's appeal was allowed, and the overall appeal was partly allowed.In conclusion, the ITAT Kolkata upheld the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Act for cash payments but allowed the business expenditure under 'Subscription & Donations' in the appeal. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and specific conditions under the law while considering business expediency and exceptions.
TaxTMI 