Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 could be invoked to demand 10% of the value of bagasse and press mud, being waste/by-products arising during manufacture of sugar and sold without payment of duty, on the ground that separate accounts were not maintained for inputs and input services.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the disputed items were waste products arising in the course of sugar manufacture and were sold without payment of excise duty. It accepted that the cited precedent applied directly to these facts and that, in such circumstances, there was no requirement to maintain separate accounts or to pay 10% of the value under Rule 6(3).
Conclusion: The demand under Rule 6(3) was not sustainable and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 does not apply to waste products arising in manufacture and sold as such without duty, when no separate reversal or payment obligation is attracted on those facts.