Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the demand arising from availment of CENVAT credit on standby transformers returned to the factory.
Analysis: The appellant was manufacturing transformers and, in the course of business, supplied standby transformers during repairs of transformers returned by customers. The appellant relied on Rule 16 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 and on precedent to contend that credit could be taken on returned finished goods. Accepting that reliance, the Tribunal found that a prima facie case was made out for grant of full stay.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to 100% waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during the pendency of the appeal.