TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Revenue's appeal dismissed on interest taxation; court upholds principles, grants deduction for refunded amount.</h1> <h3>Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority</h3> Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority - TMI Issues:1. Whether interest earned on grants received and shown as payable to the Government of Gujarat is taxable as income in the hands of the assesseeRs.2. Whether the refund of grant made to District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) should be treated as an application of income for the purpose of trustRs.Analysis:Issue 1:The appeal filed by the Revenue challenged the deletion of the addition of interest earned on grants received and shown as payable to the Government of Gujarat. The Assessing Officer (AO) contended that the interest income should be taxed as income in the hands of the assessee as it was diverted for purposes other than the trust's objectives. However, the assessee argued that the interest was not income but a liability, citing a decision by the ITAT in a previous assessment year. The ITAT held that the interest did not belong to the assessee and should not be taxed as income, following the principle that the interest was diverted at source by an overriding title in favor of the State Government. The judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court supported this view, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.Issue 2:The second issue involved the deletion of an addition made on account of the refund of a grant to DRDA. The AO taxed the refunded amount, arguing that it should not be treated as an application of income for the trust. The assessee contended that the refund should be reduced from the income, following the decision of the ITAT in a previous year. The ITAT upheld the assessee's contention, stating that the refunded amount constituted a deduction while ascertaining the application of income for the purpose of section 11(1)(a) of the Act. The judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court further supported this view, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.In conclusion, both issues were decided in favor of the assessee, with the ITAT upholding the decisions of the lower authorities based on legal principles and precedents established in previous judgments.
TaxTMI 