TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Orders Deposit of 25% Service Tax Amount, Emphasizes Accurate Filings</h1> <h3>M/s. AK. Dutta & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commr. of C. Excise & Service Tax-Ranchi</h3> M/s. AK. Dutta & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commr. of C. Excise & Service Tax-Ranchi - TMI Issues:Application for waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalty under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.Analysis:The case involved an application seeking the waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties amounting to Rs.33,56,761/- and Rs.44.00 Lakhs, Rs.1,000/-, and Rs.35.00 Lakhs respectively under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The applicant, engaged in providing construction services, claimed that they mistakenly obtained Service Tax registration for both construction and Repair/Maintenance services. They argued that excluding the value of materials used in construction, they would not be liable for the tax. The applicant also mentioned a miscalculation in claiming benefits under certain notifications. The Revenue, on the other hand, contended that the applicant consistently claimed benefits under a specific notification, leading to the demand raised. The Revenue highlighted a letter mentioning the incorrect availment of benefits on Maintenance and Repair Services. After hearing both sides and examining the records, the Tribunal found discrepancies in the applicant's claims regarding notifications. The Tribunal noted that the applicant had not claimed benefits under a specific notification in their filings. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit 25% of the Service Tax amount within eight weeks, with the balance dues waived upon compliance.In conclusion, the judgment addressed the issues of mistaken Service Tax registration, incorrect claim of benefits under notifications, and the subsequent demand raised by the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate filings and upheld the partial waiver of dues, subject to the applicant's compliance with the deposit directive.
TaxTMI 