Management service fees taxed in India, with withholding required after rejection of an imported make-available test.

Management service payments to a French service provider were treated as fees for technical services under the India-France tax treaty and the Income-tax Act because the services fell within the domestic definition of managerial, technical or consultancy services. The claimed "make available" condition from the treaty protocol was rejected, as the protocol could not import a restriction not contained in Article 13. As the payments were taxable in India in the hands of the non-resident recipient, the Indian payer was required to deduct tax at source under Section 195.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the payments for management services made by the Indian applicant to the French service provider were taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-France tax treaty and the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) whether, if such payments were taxable in India, the applicant was required to deduct tax at source under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Issue (i): Whether the payments for management services made by the Indian applicant to the French service provider were taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-France tax treaty and the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The services were accepted as managerial, technical or consultancy services falling within the domestic definition of fees for technical services. The contention that the protocol to the India-France DTAA imported a restrictive "make available" requirement was rejected. The protocol was held to operate only to the extent of limiting rate or scope where specifically provided, and could not be used to import words or conditions not contained in Article 13 of the treaty. The treaty was therefore read on its own terms, and the services were held to remain chargeable as fees for technical services.

Conclusion: The payments were taxable in India as fees for technical services.

Issue (ii): Whether, if such payments were taxable in India, the applicant was required to deduct tax at source under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: Once the consideration was held to be taxable in India in the hands of the non-resident recipient, the payer's withholding obligation under Section 195 followed. No separate ground was accepted to exclude the payment from the ambit of tax deduction at source.

Conclusion: The applicant was liable to withhold tax under Section 195.

Final Conclusion: The ruling held that the management service payments were chargeable to tax in India as fees for technical services, and the Indian payer was obliged to deduct tax at source.

Ratio Decidendi: A treaty protocol cannot be used to import a condition not found in the treaty text, and where the payment is taxable in India as fees for technical services, withholding under Section 195 follows.

---