Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the assessed turnover and refusing remand on the basis that the seized slips, book marked 'A', stock variation and recorded statement did not establish sales suppression, but only job work.
Analysis: The assessee had consistently been treated in the earlier and later assessment years as carrying on job work, and the records such as order forms, delivery bills, receipt vouchers, issue vouchers and labour bills supported that position. The entries in the seized materials were reconciled with the surrounding documentary evidence and the names noted therein were shown to relate to main workers and sub-artisans. The Revenue did not produce material to establish actual sales or purchase of jewellery or receipt of sale consideration. The alleged stock variation was also explained as sample jewellery entrusted by dealers for manufacture on their behalf. The findings turned on appreciation of evidence and did not disclose any perversity warranting interference.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was correct in holding that the materials did not prove sales suppression and in setting aside the remand. The Revenue's revisions failed.