Classification of gas lighters as non-electronic goods sustained on commercial understanding, sample evidence, and concurrent findings.

Electronic gas lighters were held not to be electronic goods under item 41(c) of the First Schedule, because the record supported the finding that they were manually operated lighters and not devices operated by electricity or electronic components. The authorities' concurrent classification under Entry 123 was sustained on the basis of the sample produced, commercial understanding of the product, and departmental clarifications, and the assessee's failure to maintain or produce supporting purchase and sale records weakened its challenge. A different view taken in another jurisdiction and reliance on dictionary meaning did not displace the concurrent factual findings. Classification under Entry 123 at 8% was upheld and the revision was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether electronic gas lighters were classifiable as electronic goods falling under item 41(c) of the First Schedule and taxable at 3%, or as goods falling under Entry 123 of the First Schedule and taxable at 8%.

Analysis: The assessee failed to maintain or produce supporting records for purchase and sale of the goods. The authorities concurrently found that the article was a manually operated gas lighter and not a device operated by electricity or electronic components. The Tribunal relied on the sample produced, the commercial understanding of the product, and the departmental clarifications classifying gas lighters under Entry 123. The Court held that the materials on record supported the view that the item was not an electronic good, and no illegality was shown in the concurrent findings merely because a different view had been taken in another jurisdiction or because dictionary meaning was invoked.

Conclusion: The classification under Entry 123 of the First Schedule at 8% was upheld, and the revision was dismissed.

---