Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether supply and fixing of metal crash barriers on highways constituted civil works attracting the lower rate of tax applicable to construction of buildings, bridges or roads, or works contract taxable at the higher rate.
Analysis: The installation of crash barriers was found to serve road safety and vehicle restraint functions on highways and to require cement-concrete foundation and allied installation work. The barriers were treated as an integral part of the road infrastructure and not as a separate or independent contract. The classification therefore fell within civil works connected with road construction.
Conclusion: The lower rate of tax applicable to civil works was correctly applied, and the higher rate was not attracted.
Final Conclusion: The petitions challenging the Tribunal's classification were rejected, and the assessee's treatment of the contract as civil works was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where road safety installations form an integral part of highway construction and require civil foundation work, they are to be classified as civil works for tax purposes.