Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's additional claim for deduction under section 36(1)(viia) could be entertained and, in the absence of examination of the supporting material by the lower authorities, whether the matter should be remitted to the Assessing Officer.
Analysis: The additional claim was rejected by the first appellate authority mainly on the ground that no supporting material had been placed on record and the claim had not been raised before the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had filed a paper book containing relevant documents, that those materials had not been examined by either the Assessing Officer or the first appellate authority, and that there appeared to be a communication gap in the appellate proceedings. In the interests of justice, the Tribunal admitted the paper book and considered it appropriate to have the issue examined afresh by the Assessing Officer after giving adequate opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The issue of deduction under section 36(1)(viia) was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a materially relevant claim is raised without prior examination of supporting evidence, the appellate forum may admit the material and remit the issue for fresh adjudication after granting opportunity of hearing.