Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to waiver of penalty under section 18B(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 on the basis that the wealth returns were filed voluntarily and in good faith before notice under section 14(2), and that the disclosed wealth was accepted.
Analysis: The returns for the relevant assessment years were filed by the petitioner after attaining majority and before any notice under section 14(2) was received. The wealth disclosed in those returns was accepted by the department. These facts established the petitioner's bona fides and satisfied the requirements for waiver. The reasoning that income-tax had been regularly paid from an earlier assessment year was held to be misconceived and did not justify refusal of waiver.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to waiver under section 18B(1)(a); the refusal order was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, the Commissioner's order declining waiver was quashed, and the penalties imposed for the relevant assessment years were also quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxpayer files wealth returns voluntarily and in good faith before notice and the disclosed wealth is accepted, the statutory requirements for waiver are satisfied and refusal of waiver is unjustified.