TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on capital gains and transfer fees</h1> <h3>Suvarna Nagar Co–operative Housing Society Limited Versus Income Tax Officer</h3> Suvarna Nagar Co–operative Housing Society Limited Versus Income Tax Officer - TMI Issues:1. Tax treatment of capital gains on the sale of common plot of land.2. Taxability of transfer fee received from members.Issue 1: Tax treatment of capital gains on the sale of common plot of landThe assessee challenged the order of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the tax treatment of capital gains amounting to Rs. 73,52,640 from the sale of a common plot of land. The Assessing Officer treated the entire amount as business income due to the nature of activities carried out by the cooperative housing societies involved in the sale. The Tribunal had previously set aside a similar issue for reconsideration by the Assessing Officer, directing compliance with specific directions. In line with this precedent, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and directed the Assessing Officer to decide the issue afresh, considering the observations and directions given by the Tribunal in the previous case.Issue 2: Taxability of transfer fee received from membersThe second issue revolved around the taxability of transfer fees totaling Rs. 30.30 lakhs received from members. The Assessing Officer considered the entire amount as taxable income, rejecting the claim of exemption based on the principle of mutuality. The Commissioner (Appeals) also disallowed the exemption, citing the applicability of restrictions on transfer fees. However, the Tribunal, after considering relevant case laws, notably the decision of the Bombay High Court, held that the transfer fee was not taxable under the principles of mutuality. The Tribunal emphasized that the nature of the society and the specific circumstances distinguished it from housing residential societies, leading to the allowance of the appeal on this issue.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) on both issues. The tax treatment of capital gains on the sale of the common plot of land was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, while the taxability of transfer fees received from members was ruled in favor of the assessee based on the principles of mutuality.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
