Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 6(2) and Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules apply to iron ore fines emerging as waste during manufacture, so as to require payment of 10% of their value on clearance.
Analysis: The iron ore fines arose only during handling, sorting, grading and screening of iron ore used as raw material for manufacture of sponge iron. They were found to be unusable in the assessee's kiln and to remain the same raw material in smaller size, emerging incidentally as inevitable waste or segregated raw material. The requirement of payment under Rule 6 was held to relate to exempted final products and not to waste or by-products emerging in the course of manufacture.
Conclusion: Rule 6 was not applicable to the iron ore fines, and no 10% payment was required on their clearance.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the order relieving the assessee from the disputed demand was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not fasten liability on waste or by-products that emerge incidentally during manufacture; the provision applies to exempted final products.