Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be sustained when the assessee had paid the entire duty and interest before issuance of the show cause notice and had intimated the department, attracting Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The duty demand and interest were paid after the department pointed out the alleged ineligibility for exemption, and this payment was made before the show cause notice was issued. The fact of such payment was also communicated to the department. In these circumstances, Section 11A(2B) applied, under which issuance of a show cause notice was not required once the duty and interest had been discharged before notice. As the statutory basis for further proceedings was absent, the penalty provision could not be invoked.
Conclusion: The penalty was not legally sustainable and was set aside.