Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the demanded duty and penalty.
Analysis: The dispute concerned duty demanded on packing materials procured duty-free under Notification No. 43/2001-C.E. (N.T.) and used in export-related activity under advance licences, where the Revenue alleged that the appellant could not simultaneously take benefit of the customs notification governing the imported inputs. The Tribunal noted that any breach of the customs notification would ordinarily have consequences in customs duty on the imported materials, while the packing materials themselves were procured domestically under the excise notification. On that prima facie view, and relying on an earlier stay order cited before it, the Tribunal found that the appellant had shown a sufficient case for interim protection.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in favour of the appellant.